INSTRUMENT
FLIGHT RULES
1.
WHAT IS THE
TAKE-OFF MINIMA WITHOUT A TAKE-OFF ALTERNATE?
o
The requirement regarding take-off minima primarily consider
visibility or RVR limits unless there is a specific need to see and avoid
obstacles on departure, in which case a cloud ceiling limit may also be
imposed. The basic rule is that an aircraft can take-off provided
that, in the event of an emergency, it can land again, during the course of
which it may be necessary for the aircraft to carry out an instrument approach
procedure. Therefore, the take-off minima in this case may be governed by the landing
minima requirement.
Table 1 –
take-off minima Multi engine aircraft that can comply
FACILITIES
|
RVR/VIS
|
NIL (Basic
by day Only)
|
500m
|
Runway
edge lights & or CL markings(night requires lights)
|
250m(300m)
|
Runway edge and centre line lighting
|
200m (250m)
|
Runway edge centre line lighting TDZ, MID and roll out RVR
|
150m (200m)
|
·
Aircraft whose performance is such that with a critical power unit
failure cannot climb to 1500 feet above the aerodrome whilst clearing obstacles
may not take-off with a visibility less that 1500m…this basically applies to
Single engine aircraft and Twin engine aircraft whose single engine performance
is less than required.
·
If you fly a multiengine aircraft that can comply with the 1500ft
rule, then you may work on a visibility as per the table. This means that the
lowest possible visibility for take-off is 150m
– If LVP’s are in force and the crew are certified to operate in LVP
conditions.
·
LVP’s come into force when the lowest RVR at an aerodrome falls
below 600m and the cloud ceiling is 200 ft or less.
·
Therefore, if we fly an aircraft that cannot comply – legally you
cannot take-off if the visibility is less than 1500m.
Table 2 –
multi-engine aircraft that cannot comply with the 1500 ft rule, but can clear
obstacle along the take-off path from an assumed engine failure height.
ASSUMED ENGINE FAILURE HEIGHT
|
RVR/VIS
|
Less than
50ft
|
200m
|
51 to
100ft
|
300m
|
101 to
150ft
|
400m
|
151 to
200ft
|
500m
|
201 to 300ft
|
1000m
|
More than
300ft
|
1500m
|
·
In order to calculate the assumed engine failure height, the operator must establish the aerodrome
specifics i.e. obstacles affecting take-off path (usually outsourced experts),
then the single-engine/critical engine performance is calculated and is plotted
against the all engine performance.
·
If aircraft’s assumed engine failure height is greater than 300ft agl then the minimum visibility
remains 1500m
Take-off
minima multi engine aircraft that cannot comply
Minimum Required RVR/Visibility for Take-off
|
1500m
|
Ref: South
African CATS (91.07.5)
2.
WHAT IS THE
TAKE-OFF MINIMA WITH A TAKE-OFF ALTERNATE?
o
The owner or operator shall
select and specify in the air traffic service flight plan referred to in Civil
Aviation Regulation 91.03.4, a take-off alternate aerodrome, if it would not be
possible for the aircraft to return to the aerodrome of departure due to
meteorological or performance reasons.
o
The take-off alternate aerodrome referred to,
shall be located within –
§ (a) twenty (20) minutes
flying time from the departure aerodrome in the case of single-engine
aeroplane; or
§ (b) one hour flight time at one-engine cruising speed according
to the aircraft flight manual referred to in Civil Aviation Regulation 91.03.2,
in still air standard conditions based on the actual take-off mass for a
twin-engine aircraft; or
§ (c) two hours flight time at one-engine inoperative cruising
speed according to the aircraft flight manual referred to in Civil Aviation Regulation
91.03.2, in still air standard conditions based on the actual take-off mass for
three engine and four-engine aircraft:
Provided
that if the aircraft flight manual referred to in Civil Aviation Regulation
91.03.2, does not contain a one-engine inoperative cruising speed as referred
to in paragraphs (b) and (c), the speed to be used for calculation, shall be
the speed which is achieved with the remaining engine set at maximum continuous power.
GENERAL
When the reported meteorological
visibility is below that required for take-off and RVR is not reported, a
take-off may only be commenced if the pilot-in-command can determine that the
RVR/visibility along the take-off runway is equal to or better than the
required minimum.
When no reported meteorological visibility or
RVR is available, a takeoff may only be commenced if the pilot-in-command can
determine that the RVR/visibility along the take-off runway is equal to or
better than the required minimum.
VISUAL REFERENCE
The
take-off minima must be selected to ensure sufficient guidance to control the
aeroplane in the event of both a discontinued take-off in adverse circumstances
and a continued take-off after failure of the critical power unit.
REQUIRED RVR/VISIBILITY
(a) For
multi-engine aeroplanes, whose performance is such that, in the event of a
critical power unit failure at any point during take-off, the aeroplane can
either stop or continue the take-off to a height of 1 500 feet above the
aerodrome while clearing obstacles by the required margins, the take-off minima
established by an operator must be expressed as RVR/Visibility values not lower
than those given in Table 1 below except as provided in paragraph below:
TAKE-
OFF RVR/ VISIBILITY
|
|
FACILITIES
|
RVR/ VISIBILITY
(NOTE 3)
|
NIL (DAY ONLY)
|
500M
|
RUNWAY EDGE LIGHTING
AND/ OR CENTRELINE MARKINGS
|
250/300M (NOTES 1
AND 2)
|
RUNWAY EDGE AND
CENTRELINE LIGHTING
|
200/250 M (NOTE 1)
|
RWY EDGE AND
CENTRELINE LIGHTING MULTIPLE RVR INFORMATION
|
150/200 M (NOTES 1
AND 4)
|
NOTES
1.
The higher values apply to Category D aeroplanes
2.
For night operations at least runway edge and runway end lights
are required.
3.
The reported RVR/Visibility value representative of the initial
part of the take-off run can be replaced by pilot assessment.
The required RVR value must be achieved for all of the relevant
RVR reporting points with the exception given in Note 3 above.
Ref:
Civil Aviation Regulation 91.07.7
3.
GIVE
THE WEATHER MINIMA’S REQUIRED FOR A TAKE-OFF ALTERNATE.
(1) On a flight to be conducted in accordance with IFR, the
pilot-in command of an aircraft shall not –
(a) Commence take-off; or
(b) Continue beyond the in-flight decision point,
unless information is available indicating that conditions
will, at the estimated
time of arrival of such aircraft, be at, or above, the
applicable aerodrome operating minima-
(1)
At the destination aerodrome; or
(2) Where a destination alternate aerodrome is required, at the
destination aerodrome and one destination alternate aerodrome or at two
destination alternate aerodromes.
(2) On a flight conducted in
accordance with VFR, the pilot-in-command of an aircraft shall not commence
take-off unless current meteorological reports, or a combination of current
reports and forecasts, indicate that the meteorological conditions along the
route, or part of the route to be flown under VFR, shall, at the appropriate
time, be such as to render compliance with the provisions prescribed in this
part possible.
Ref: Civil Aviation Regulation
91.07.9
4.
GIVE
THE WEATHER MINIMA’S REQUIRED FOR THE DESTINATION ALTERNATE
An owner or operator may only select the destination aerodrome
or alternate destination aerodrome when the appropriate weather reports or
forecasts, or any combination thereof, indicate that, during a period
commencing 1 hour before and ending 1 hour after the estimated time of arrival
at the aerodrome, the weather conditions will be at or above the applicable
planning minima as follows:
(a) Planning minima for the destination aerodrome
(i) RVR/visibility must be in accordance with that specified in
Civil Aviation Regulation 91.07.5; and
(ii) for a non-precision approach or a circling approach, the
ceiling at or
above MDH.
(b) Planning minima for
destination alternate aerodrome must be in accordance with the table below.
Table 1: Planning minima- En route and destination alternates
Type of approach
|
Planning minima
|
Cat
II and III
|
Cat
I minima with RVR in accordance with CATS 91.07.5
|
Cat
I
|
Non-precision
minima and ceiling must be above the MDH
|
Non-Precision
|
Non-precision
minima plus 200 ft added to MDH and 1000m added to RVR/Visibility. Ceiling
must be above the MDH +200 ft
|
Circling
|
Circling
|
Note: Only operators approved for Cat II
and III operations may use planning minima based on a Cat II and III in table 1
Ref: South African CATS (91.07.8)
5.
HOW
MANY DESTINATION ALTERNATES MUST BE PLANNED?
·
The owner or operator of an aeroplane shall select at least one destination alternate aerodrome for
each IFR flight unless-
a)
Two suitable non-intersecting
runways are available at the destination aerodrome, and
b)
The meteorological conditions
prevailing are such that, for the period from 1 hour before until 1 hour after
the expected time of arrival at the destination aerodrome, the approach from
the minimum sector safe altitude and landing can be made in VMC, or
c)
The destination aerodrome is isolated
and no adequate destination alternate aerodrome exists.
·
The owner or operator shall select two destination alternate
aerodromes when –
1)
The appropriate weather reports or forecasts for the
destination aerodrome, or any combination thereof, indicate that during a
period commencing one hour before and ending one hour after the estimated time
of arrival, the weather conditions will be below the applicable planning
minima, or
2)
No meteorological information can be obtained.
Ref: South African CAR (91.07.7)
6.
WHAT
ARE THE PLANNING CRITERIA FOR ‘NON-PRECISION’ AND ‘PRECISION’ APPROACHES.
Precision Approach (ILS)
The
precision approach, as the name suggests is very accurate. It comprises a localizer
for directional guidance and an electronic glide path for descent guidance. It
may be declared as a category I, II or III ILS, depending on the accuracy and
application of the particular procedure. A category I ILS is capable of guiding
an aircraft down to 200 ft agl with an associated RVR of 550 meters. Marker
beacons, often co-located with NDB’s are used with the procedure to provide
heights during the approach.
General
A category I operation is a
precision instrument approach procedure which provides for an approach to a
decision height not lower than
200ft and a visibility not less than 800 m or RVR not less than 550m.
Decision Height
An operator must ensure that the
decision height to be used for a category I precision approach is not lower
Than
(a) The
minimum decision height specified in the aeroplane flight manual (AFM) if
stated
(b) The
minimum height to which the precision approach aid can be used without the
required visual reference
(c)
The OCH/OCA for the category of aeroplane or
(d) 200ft
Visual Reference
A pilot may not continue an approach below the category I
decision height, determined in accordance with paragraph (2) above, unless at
least one of the following references for the intended runway is distinctly
visible to the pilot
(a) Elements
of the approach light systems
(b) The
threshold
(c)
The threshold markings
(d) The
threshold lights
(e) The
threshold identification lights
(f)
The visual glide slope indicator
(g) The
touchdown zone or touch zone markings
(h) The
touchdown zone lights or
(i)
Runway edge lights.
Required RVR
The lowest minima to be
used by an operator for category I operations are:
CATEGORY 1 MINIMA
|
||||
DECISION HEIGHT
|
FACILITIES/RVR (NOTE 5)
|
|||
Full
(NOTE
1 and 6)
|
Interm.
(NOTE
2 and 6)
|
Basic
(NOTES
3 and 6)
|
Nil
(NOTES
4 and 6)
|
|
200
ft
|
550m
|
700m
|
800m
|
1000m
|
201ft
– 250 ft
|
600m
|
700m
|
800m
|
1000m
|
251ft
– 300ft
|
650m
|
800m
|
900m
|
1200m
|
301
ft and above
|
800m
|
900m
|
1000m
|
1200m
|
NOTES
1)
Full
facilities comprise of runway markings, 720 m or more of HI/MI approach lights,
runway edge lights, threshold lights and runway end lights. Lights must be on.
2)
Intermediate
facilities comprise runway markings, 420 – 719 m of HI/MI approach lights,
runway edge lights, threshold lights and runway end lights. Lights must be on.
3)
Basic
facilities comprise runway markings < 420 m of HI/MI approach lights, any
length of LI approach lights, runway edge lights, threshold lights and runway
end lights. Lights must be on.
4)
Nil
approach light facilities comprise runway markings, runway edge lights,
threshold lights, runway end lights or no lights at all.
5)
The
above figures are either the reported RVR or meteorological visibility
converted to RVR as in accordance with CATS 131.6.
6)
The
table is applicable to convectional approaches with the glide slope angle up to
and including 4 degrees.
7)
The
DH mentioned in table 5 refers to the initial calculation of DH. When selecting
the associated RVR, there is no need to take account of a rounding up to the
nearest ten feet, which may be done for operational purposes, e.g. conversion
to DA.
SINGLE
PILOT OPERATIONS
For
single operations, an operator must calculate the minimum RVR for all approaches
n accordance with CAR 121.07.7 and associated CATS. An RVR of less than 800 m
is not permitted except when using a suitable autopilot coupled to an ILS or
MLS, in which case normal minima apply. The decision height may not be less
than 1.25 X the minimum disengagement height for the autopilot.
NON- PRECISION APPROACH
This
is usually an NDB or VOR procedure or a combination of both, possibly even
using DME for range guidance. It can also include a “localizer only” approach
when, during the course of an ILS approach, the glide slope becomes inoperative.
System
Minima
Am
operator must ensure that system minima for non-precision approach procedures,
which are based upon the use of ILS without glide path (LLZ only), VOR, NDB,
SRA and VDF are not lower than the MDH values given in the table below.
System
Minima
|
|
Facility
|
Lowest MDH
|
ILS
(no glide path – LLZ)
|
250 ft
|
SRA
(terminating at ½ NM)
|
250 ft
|
SRA
(terminating at 1 NM)
|
300 ft
|
SRA
(terminating at 2NM)
|
350 ft
|
VOR
|
300 ft
|
VOR/DME
|
250 ft
|
NDB
|
300 ft
|
VDF
(QDM AND QGH)
|
300 ft
|
Minimum
descent height
An
operator must ensure that the minimum descent height for a non-precision
approach is not lower than either-
A)
The OCH/OCA for the category of aeroplane; or
B)
The system minimum.
Visual
Reference
A
pilot may not continue an approach below MDA/MDH unless at least one of the
following visual references for the intended runway is distinctly visible and
indentified to the pilot
a)
Elements of the approach light systems
b)
The threshold
c)
The threshold markings
d)
The threshold lights
e)
The threshold identification lights
f)
The visual glide slope indicator
g)
The touchdown zone or touchdown zone markings
h)
The touchdown zone lights
i)
Runway edge lights or
j)
Other visual references accepted by the commissioner
Required
RVR
The
lowest minima to be used by an operator for non-precision approaches are:
Table 6(a): RVR for
non-precision approach- FULL facilities
Non-
Precision Approach Minima
Full
Facilities (Notes 1,5,6 AND 7)
|
||||
MDH
|
RVR/Aeroplane
Category
|
|||
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
250
ft-299 ft
|
800 m
|
800 m
|
800 m
|
1200 m
|
300
ft-449 ft
|
900 m
|
1000 m
|
1000 m
|
1400 m
|
450
ft-649 ft
|
1000 m
|
1200 m
|
1200 m
|
1600 m
|
650
ft and above
|
1200 m
|
1400 m
|
1400 m
|
1800 m
|
Table 6(b): RVR for non-precision
approach- INTERMEDIATE facilities
Non-precision
approach minima
Full
Facilities (Notes 2,5, 6 and 7)
|
||||
MDH
|
RVR/Aeroplane
Category
|
|||
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
250
ft- 299FT
|
1000 m
|
1100 m
|
1200 m
|
1400 m
|
300
ft- 449FT
|
1200 m
|
1300 m
|
1400 m
|
1600 m
|
450
ft – 649 ft
|
1400 m
|
1500 m
|
1600 m
|
1800 m
|
650
ft and above
|
1500 m
|
1500 m
|
1800 m
|
2000 m
|
Table 6(c): RVR for
non-precision approach- BASIC facilities
Non-Precision
Approach Minima
Full
Facilities (Notes 3, 5, 6, and 7)
|
||||
MDH
|
RVR/Aeroplane
Category
|
|||
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
250
ft – 299 ft
|
1200 m
|
1300 m
|
1400 m
|
1600 m
|
300
ft – 449 ft
|
1300 m
|
1400 m
|
1600 m
|
1800 m
|
450
ft – 649 ft
|
1500 m
|
1500 m
|
1800 m
|
2000 m
|
650
ft and above
|
1500 m
|
1500 m
|
2000 m
|
2000 m
|
Table 4(d): RVR for
non-precision approach- NIL approach light facilities
Non-Precision
Approach Minima
Full
Facilities (Notes 4, 5, 6 and 7)
|
||||
MDH
|
RVR/Aeroplane
Category
|
|||
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
|
250
ft – 299 ft
|
1500 m
|
1500 m
|
1600 m
|
1800 m
|
300
ft – 449 ft
|
1500 m
|
1500 m
|
1800 m
|
2000 m
|
450
ft – 649 ft
|
1500 m
|
1500 m
|
2000 m
|
2000 m
|
650
ft and above
|
1500 m
|
1500 m
|
2000 m
|
2000 m
|
NOTES
1)
Full
facilities comprise runway markings, 720m or more of HI/MI approach lights,
runway edge lights, threshold lights and runway end lights. Lights must be on.
2)
Intermediate
facilities comprise runway markings, 420- 719m of HI/MI approach lights, runway
edge lights, threshold lights and runway end lights. Lights must be on.
3)
Basic
facilities comprise of runway markings < 420m of HI/MI approach, any length
of LI approach light lights, runway edge lights, threshold lights and runway
end lights. Lights must be on.
4)
Nil
approach light facilities comprise runway light markings, runway edge lights,
threshold lights, runway end lights or no lights at all.
5)
The
tables are only applicable to convectional approaches with a normal descent
slope of not greater than 4 degrees. Greater descent slopes will usually
require that visual glide slope guidance (e.g. PAPI) is also visible at the
minimum descent height.
6)
The
above figures are either reported RVR or metrological visibility converted to
RVR as in CATS 121.07.7.8 below.
7)
The
MDH mentioned in Table 4 (a), 4(b),4(c), and 4(d) refers to the initial
calculation of MDH. When selecting the associated RVR, there is no need to take
account or rounding up to the nearest ten ft, which may be done for operational
purposes, e.g. conversion to MDA.
Ref: South African CATS (91.07.5)
7.
EXPLAIN
THE ICAO RADIO FAILURE PROCEDURE.
6.1 General Rules
6.1.1 An
aircraft operated as a controlled flight shall maintain continuous listening
and watch on the appropriate radio frequency of, and establish two way
communication as necessary with, the appropriate air traffic control unit,
except as may be prescribed by the appropriate ATS authority in respect of
aircraft forming part of aerodrome traffic at a controlled aerodrome.
Note: SELCAL or similar automatic signaling
devices satisfy the requirement to maintain a listening watch.
6.1.2 If
communication failure procedure compliance with 6.1.1 , the aircraft shall
comply with the communication failure procedure in 6.2 below, and with such of
the following procedures as are appropriate. In addition, the aircraft, when
forming part of the aerodrome traffic at a controlled aerodrome, shall keep a
watch for such instructions as may be issued by visual signals.
6.1.2.1 If in
visual meteorological conditions, the aircraft shall:
·
Continue to fly in visual meteorological conditions
·
Land at the nearest suitable aerodrome, and
·
Report its arrival by the most expeditious means to the
appropriate air traffic unit.
6.1.2.2 if in
Instrument meteorological conditions or when conditions are such that it does
not appear feasible to complete the flight in accordance with 6.1.2.1, the aircraft shall:
·
Unless otherwise prescribed on the basis of regional air
navigation agreement, maintain the last assigned speed and level, or minimum
flight altitude if higher, for a period of 20 minutes following the aircraft’s
failure to report its position over a compulsory reporting point and thereafter
adjust level and speed in accordance with the filed plan
·
Proceed with the current flight plan to the appropriate
designated navigation aid serving the destination aerodrome and, when required
to ensure compliance with c below, hold over this aid until commencement of
descent.
·
Commence decent from the navigational aid specified in b at, or
as close as possible to, the expected approach time last received and
acknowledge, or, if no expected approach time has been received and
acknowledged, at or as close as possible to the estimated time of arrival resulting from the current flight
plan
·
Land, if possible, within thirty minutes after the estimated
time of arrival specified in c, or the last acknowledged expected approach
time, whichever is later
Note:
1.
As evidence by the meteorological conditions prescribed
therein, 6.1.2.1. Relates to all controlled flights, whereas 6.1.2.2. relates
only to IFR flights.
2.
The provision of air traffic control service to other flights
operating in the airspace concerned will
be based on the premise that an aircraft experiencing communication failure
will comply with the rules in 6.1.2.2.
6.2
Air – Ground communication failure
6.2.1
When an aircraft station fails to establish contact with the
aeronautical station on the designated frequency, it shall attempt to establish
contact on another frequency appropriate to the route. If this attempt fails,
the aircraft station shall attempt to establish communication with other
aircraft or other aeronautical stations on frequencies appropriate to the
route. In addition, an aircraft operating within a network shall monitor the
appropriate VHF frequency for calls from nearby aircraft.
6.2.2
If the attempts specified under 6.2.1 fail, the aircraft
station shall transmit its message twice on the designated frequency (ies), proceeded
by the phrase “TRANSMITTING BLIND” and,
if necessary, include the addresses for which the message is intended. Procedures
for air navigation services (PANS) recommendations- in network
operation, a message which is transmitting twice on both primary and secondary
frequencies. Before changing frequency, the aircraft station should announce
the frequency to which it is changing.
6.3
Receiver Failure
6.3.1
When an aircraft station is unable to establish communication
due to receiver failure, it shall transmit reports at the scheduled times, or
positions, on the frequency in use, preceded by the phrase “Transmitting Blind due to receiver
failure”. The aircraft station shall complete repetition. During this procedure,
the aircraft shall also advise the time of its next intended transmission.
6.3.2
Am aircraft which is provided with air traffic control or
advisory service shall, in addition to complying with 6.3.1, transmit
information regarding the intention of the pilot-in-command with respect to the
continuation of the flight of the aircraft.
6.3.3
When an aircraft is unable to establish communication due to
airborne equipment failure it shall, when so equipped, select the appropriate
SSR code to indicate radio failure.
6.4
Transponder Procedure- Radio communication failure
6.4.1
The pilot of an aircraft losing two-way communication shall set
the transponder to mode A code 7600.
8.
EXPLAIN
THE RADIO FAILURE PROCEDURES IN SOUTH AFRICA.
Following
procedures shall not apply to aircraft following SIDs or STARs at Johannesburg,
Cape Town, or Durban, in respect of which special communication failure
procedures are included.
In
VMC: ICAO procedure
In
IMC: ICAO procedure, supplemented as follows
a)
Proceed according to the current flight plan. If however, an
ATC clearance has been received that the flight is restricted to a flight level
below the flight level specified in the current flight plan, the last assigned
flight must be maintained for 3 minutes on reaching, provided terrain permits.
After 3 minutes the aircraft is to climb, at the normal rate of climb, to the
flight level specified in the current flight plan.
b)
Proceed according to the current flight plan to the appropriate
designated navigational aid (navigation facility) serving the aerodrome of
intended landing and holding over this aid until commencement of descent.
c)
Commence descent from the designated navigational aid, at, or
if no EAT has been received and acknowledged, at the expected time of arrival
as indicated in the filed flight plan and revised in accordance with the
current flight plan, lus ten minutes or as soon as possible thereafter
d)
Complete a normal instrument approach procedure in relation to
the navigational facility
e)
Land, if possible, within 30 minutes after the estimated time
of arrival plus 10 minutes, or the last acknowledged expected approach time,
whichever is later.
9.
EXPLAIN
THE DIFFERENT HOLDING ENTRY PROCEDURES.
Entry
The entry into a holding
pattern shall be according to heading in relation to the three entry sectors,
recognizing a zone of flexibility of 5 degrees on either side of the sector
boundaries. For holding on a VOR intersection, the entry track is limited to
the radials forming the intersection. For holding on a VOR/DME fix, the entry
track is limited to either the VOR radial, DME arc, or alternatively along the
entry radial to a VOR/DME fix at the end of the outbound leg, as published.
1.3.2
SECTOR 1 PROCEDURE (PARALLEL ENTRY)
I.
The aircraft is approaching in the 110
degrees sector. On reaching the holding fix, the aircraft will turn onto the
outbound heading and fly for one minute.
II.
After one minute the aircraft will turn (left
for a standard holding pattern and right for a non-standard pattern) into the
pattern and return to the fix.
III.
On its second arrival overhead the fix,
the aircraft will turn onto the outbound heading and follow the pattern.
1.3.3 SECTOR 2 PROCEDURE (OFFSET/TEARDROP)
I.
The aircraft is approaching in the
smallest, (70 degrees) sector. On reaching the fix, the aircraft will fly a
heading 30 degrees into the pattern, (i.e. 30 degrees to the right of the
outbound heading for a non-standard pattern and 30 degrees to the left of the
outbound heading for a standard pattern).
II.
The aircraft will then fly this heading
for one minute and then turn inbound to the holding fix and return to the fix.
III.
On its second arrival over the fix, the
aircraft will turn onto the outbound heading and follow the pattern.
1.3.4 SECTOR 3 PROCEDURE (DIRECT)
I.
The aircraft is approaching the fix in the
largest (180 degrees) sector. On reaching the fix, the aircraft will turn right
onto the outbound heading and follow the pattern.
Ref:
Instrument Rating Flight Manual
10.GIVE
THE HOLDING SPEEDS RESTRICTIONS
LEVELS
|
NORMAL
CONDITIONS
|
TURBULENCE
CONDITIONS
|
0-
14000 ft
|
230KT(2) / 170 KT(4)
|
280KTS (3) /170KTS (4)
|
14000 ft – 20000 ft
|
240KTS (5)
|
280KTS OR 0.8 mach whichever is less (3)
|
20000 ft – 34000 ft
|
265 KTS (5)
|
|
above 34000 ft
|
0.83 mach
|
0.83 mach
|
1. The
term “level” represents altitudes
or corresponding flight levels depending upon the altimeter setting in use
2. When
the holding procedure is followed by the initial approach segment of an
instrument approach procedure promulgated at a higher speed, then the holding
speed may be at the higher speed.
3. The
speed of 280 kt/0.8 mach reserved for turbulent conditions should be used
only after prior clearance from ATC, unless the relevant charts indicate that
the holding area can accommodate aircraft flying at these higher holding
speeds
4. For
holding limited to Category A and B aircraft only.
5. Wherever
possible, 280 kt should be used for holding procedures associated with airway
route structures.
|
Ref: The Instrument Rating Manual
11.WHAT
ARE THE APPROACH SPEED LIMITATIONS IN TMA’S AND CTR’S?
(1) Unless otherwise authorized by the Commissioner, no person
shall, outside controlled airspace and below flight level 100, fly an aircraft
at an indicated air speed of more than 250 knots.
(2) Unless otherwise authorized or required by an air traffic
service unit, no person shall fly an aircraft within a control zone or an
aerodrome traffic zone at an indicated air speed of more than –
(a) 160 knots, in the case of
a reciprocating-engine aircraft; or
(b) 200 knots, in the case of
a turbine-powered aircraft:
Provided that if the minimum
safe indicated air speed for a particular flight is greater than the maximum
indicated air speed prescribed in this regulation, the aircraft may be flown at
the minimum safe indicated air speed.
Ref:
South African (CAR 91.06.9)
12.IS
THE GENERAL SPEED RESTRICTION OF 250KTS AT 40 NM INTO JNB TMA STILL IN FORCE?
·
Unless advised b ATC, all aircraft inbound to Johannesburg,
Lanseria, Waterkloof Military, Port Elizabeth, Durban ND Cape Town airports,
not on a STAR, will comply with the following maximum KIAS
o
Within 40 DME JSV/PEV/CTV/DNV: 250KT
o
Within 15 DME JSV/PEV/CTV/DNV: 210KT
Within
the Cape Town Special Rules Area, flights are limited to Max IAS 180KT.
Ref: South African AIP
13.EXPLAIN
THE DIFFERENT AIRCRAFT SPEED CATEGORIES.
·
The following five categories of aircraft have been established
by ICAO on the basis of 1.3 times the stall speed in the landing
configuration at maximum certified landing mass.
Category Speed
|
|
Category A
|
Less
than 91kts IAS
|
Category B
|
91
kts or more, but less than 121 kts IAS
|
Category C
|
121
kts or more, but less than 141 kts IAS
|
Category D
|
141
kts or more, but less than 166 kts IAS
|
Category E
|
166kts
or more but less than 211 kts IAS
|
Ref:
South African AIP (ENR 1.8.1.2.6)
14.EXPLAIN
THE DIFFERENT AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE CLASSIFICATIONS.
·
For performance purposes, aeroplanes are classified as follows:
(a) Class A aeroplanes –
(i) Multi-engine aeroplanes powered by turbo-propeller engines
with a maximum certificated mass
exceeding 5 700 kilograms; and
(ii) Multi-engine
turbojet-powered aeroplanes;
(b) Class B aeroplanes
– propeller-driven aeroplanes with a maximum certificated mass of 5 700
kilograms or less;
(c) Class C aeroplanes
– aeroplanes powered by two or more reciprocating engines with a maximum
certificated mass exceeding 5 700 kilograms; and
(d) Class D aeroplanes – single-engine aeroplanes
Ref:
South African CAR (91.09.4)
15.GIVE
THE PROCEDURE TURN APPROACH LIMITATIONS AND PROCEDURES.
·
It may also be referred to as a reversal procedure turn. Entry
is restricted to a specific direction or sector entry. A procedure turn
approach may only be executed with prior permission from the ATC and also only
if the aircraft is within 30 degrees of the outbound heading.
·
It should be noted that the airspace provided for these
procedures does not permit a racetrack or holding maneuver to be conducted
unless so specified.
·
There are of three basic maneuvers i.e.
o
Procedure
turn (45°/180°) - consisting of a specified outbound track and timing from the facility
or fix, a 45° turn away from the outbound track for 1 minute from the start of
turn for categories A and B aircraft (one minute 15 seconds from the start of
turn for categories C, D and E aircraft), followed by a 180° turn in the
opposite direction to intercept the inbound track (see Figure 6-3). The
45°/180° procedure turn is an alternative to the 80°/260° procedure turn
(paragraph b.) unless specifically excluded.
o
Procedure turn (80°/260°) -
consisting of a specified outbound track and timing from the facility or fix,
an 80° turn away from the outbound track, followed by a turn of 260° in the opposite
direction to intercept the inbound track . The 80°/260° procedure turn is an alternative
to the 45°/180° procedure turn unless specifically excluded.
o
Base turn - consisting of a specified outbound
track (A) and timing or DME distance (B) from a facility, followed by a turn to
intercept the inbound track (C) The out bound track and/or the timing may be
different for the various categories of aircraft.
Ref:
The Instrument Rating Manual
16.CAN
A PROCEDURE TURN BE INITIATED AT FATZ? IF YES, EXPALIN THE PROCEDURE.
·
Yes a procedure turn can be initiated at FATZ. When approaching
TZ NDB via 324 degrees through 144 degrees and within 30 degrees of the
outbound heading inbound, use the phraseology “Executing procedure turn
approach”.
Ref:
South African AIP
17.WHAT
IS THE STATE MINIMA FOR PRECISION APPROACH?
ILS CATEGORY
|
DECISION HEIGHT
|
RVR
|
VISIBILITY
|
Cat I
|
200
feet
|
550
m
|
800 m
|
Cat II
|
100
feet
|
300
m
|
Not
applicable
|
Cat III a
|
Lower
than 100 feet or
No
DH
|
200
m
|
Not
applicable
|
Cat III b
|
Lower
than 50 feet or
No
DH
|
Lower
than 200 m
But
not lower than 75m
|
Not
applicable
|
Cat III c
|
No
DH
|
No
RVR
Limitations
|
Not
applicable
|
Ref: South African CATS (91.07.5)
18.WHAT
IS THE STATE MINIMAS FOR NON-PRECEISION APPROACH?
NON-PRECISION
APPROACH MINIMA
|
|
Facility
|
Lowest
MDH
|
LLZ- LOCALIZER ONLY APPROACH
|
250 ft
|
VOR/DME
|
250 ft
|
VOR
|
300 ft
|
NDB
|
300 ft
|
Ref:
South African CATS (91.07.5)
19.WHAT
IS THE STATE MINIMA FOR CIRCLING APPROACH?
·
The circle to land procedure is a visual maneuver conducted after
completing an instrument approach, in order to bring the aircraft into a
position for landing on a runway that is not suitably located for a straight in
approach or when the wind strongly favors a landing on a non-instrument
approach end of a runway.
·
The visual maneuvering area for a circling approach is determined
by drawing arcs centered on each runway threshold and joining those arcs with
tangent lines (see Figure above). The radius of the arcs is related to:
a. aircraft category;
b. speed: speed for each category;
c. wind speed: 46 km/h (25 kt)
throughout the turn; and
d.
bank angle: 20° average or 3° per second, whichever requires less bank.
·
The below table lists the relationship between aircraft approach
category and the radii for visual manoeurving
CATEGORY OF AIRCRAFT/ IAS KTS
|
A/100
|
B/135
|
C/180
|
D/205
|
E/240
|
TAS at 2000ft MSL + 25kt wind factor
|
131
|
168
|
215
|
242
|
279
|
RADIUS (R) OF TURN (NM)
|
0.69
|
1.13
|
1.85
|
2.34
|
3.12
|
STRIAGHT SEGMENT (NM) CONSTANT VALUE
|
0.30
|
0.40
|
0.50
|
0.60
|
0.70
|
RADIUS (*R) FROM THRESHOLD (NM)
|
1.68
|
2.66
|
4.20
|
5.28
|
6.94
|
NOTE: 2R + STRIAGHT SEGMENT
|
·
When a circling area has been established, the obstacle clearance
altitude/height is determined for each category of aircraft.
AIRCRAFT
CATEGORY
|
OBSTACLE
CLEARANCE IN FEET
|
LOWEST
OCH ABOVE AERODROME ELEVATION IN FT
|
MINIMUM
VISIBILTY IN KM (NM)
|
A
|
295
|
394
|
1.9 (1.0)
|
B
|
295
|
492
|
2.8 (1.5)
|
C
|
394
|
591
|
3.7 (2.0)
|
D
|
394
|
689
|
4.6 (2.5)
|
E
|
492
|
787
|
6.5 (3.5)
|
·
When conducting circle to land procedure, the pilot must not descend
below the approach MDA/H unless
o
Visual reference has been established and can be maintained
o
The pilot has the landing threshold in sight and
o
The required obstacle clearance can be maintained and the aircraft in a
position to carry out a landing.
Ref: South African AIP (ENR 1.8)
20.WHAT
IS THE MINIMUM AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENT FOR IMC OPERATIONS?
(1) The minimum aircraft equipment
requirement for IMC operations are–
(a) A magnetic compass;
(b) An accurate time-piece
showing the time in hours, minutes and seconds;
(c)
A sensitive pressure altimeter with subscale settings, calibrated in
hectopascal, adjustable for any barometric pressure setting likely to be
encountered during flight;
(d)
An airspeed indicator system with heated Pitot tube or equivalent means for
preventing malfunctioning due to either condensation or icing;
(e) A vertical-speed indicator;
(f) A turn-and-bank indicator, or
a turn co-ordinator, incorporating a slip indicator;
(g) An attitude indicator;
(h) A stabilized direction
indicator;
(i) A means of indicating on the
flight deck the outside air temperature in degrees Celsius;
(j) An alternate source of static
pressure for the altimeter and the airspeed and vertical-speed indicators; and
(k)
A chart holder in an easily readable position which can be illuminated, if to
be operated by night.
(2) If flight in
RVSM airspace is contemplated, the aircraft has to be equipped with-
(a) two independent altitude
measuring systems
(b) equipment for measuring
static pressure sensed by the static source converting it to pressure
altitude and displaying the pressure altitude to the flight crew;
(c) equipment for providing
digitally encoded signal corresponding to the displayed pressure altitude, for
automatic altitude reporting purposes;
(d) static source error
correction; and
(e) signals references to a
pilot-selected altitude for automatic control and alerting; as contemplated in
section 5 of Technical Standard 91.07.31 of Document SA-CATS-OPS91
Ref: Aviation Legislation in South Africa 91.04.5
21. AIRFIELD FACILITIES REQUIREMENT FOR IMC
OPERATIONS?
a.
Elements of the approach light systems
b.
The threshold;
c.
Threshold markings
d.
The threshold lights
e.
The threshold identification lights
f.
The visual glide slope indicator
g.
The touchdown zone or touchdown zone
markings
h.
the touchdown zone lights
i.
runway edge lights
j.
other visual references accepted by the
commissioner
Ref:
South African CATS (91.07.5)
22.WHAT IS AN OUTER MARKER AND GIVE THE
REASONS FOR THE USE OF AN OUTER MARKER?
·
The outer marker is used to indicate that an aircraft should
intercept the glide path when over the transmitter. The outer marker station,
located approximately 4.6 miles from the end of the runway, amplitude modulates
the 75 MHz carrier at 400 Hz. The OM station is indentified by a 400 Hz audio
tone consisting of dashes (approximately 2 dashes per second), and by the
annunciation of the “blue” indicator
light on the cockpit instrument panel.
Ref: The Instrument Rating Manual by
David J. Howarth
23.GIVE THE ICAO ALITIMETER SETTING
PROCEDURES FOR IFR FLIGHTS.
a.
Pressure
correction:
i.
3.2.1
Flight levels: When flying at levels with the altimeter set to 1013.2hpa, the
minimum safe altitude must be corrected for deviations in pressure when the
pressure is lower than the standard atmosphere (1013.2hpa). An appropriate
correction is 10m (30ft) per hpa below 1013hpa. Alternatively, the correction
can be obtained from standard correction graphs or tables supplied by the
operator.
ii.
3.2.2
QNH/QNE. When using the QNH or QFE altimeter setting (giving altitude or
height above QFE datum respectively), a pressure correction is not required.
b.
TEMPERATURE
CORRECTION:
i.
3.3.1
Requirement for temperature correction. The calculated minimum safe
altitude/heights must be adjusted when the ambient temperature on the surface
is much lower than that predicted by the standard atmosphere. In such
conditions, an approximate corrections is 4 percent height increase for every 10
degrees c below standard temperature as measured at the altimeter setting
source. This is safe for all altimeter setting altitudes for temperatures above
-15 degrees.
24.EXPLAIN
THE “DA” AND “MDA”
a.
DA
– DECISION ALTITUDE – decision altitude is a specified altitude,
in a precision approach at which a
missed approach is initiated if the visual reference to continue the approach
has not been established.
Note: Decision
altitude (DA) is referenced to mean sea level (MSL) and Decision Height (DH) is
referenced to the runway threshold.
b.
MDH
– MINIMUM DESCENT ALTITUDE – Minimum
Descent Altitude is a specified altitude in a non-precision approach at which an aircraft cannot descend below
until visual references to continue the approach and land is established.
Note: Minimum
Descent Altitude is referenced to Mean Sea Level (MSL) and Minimum Descend
Height (MDH) is referenced to runway threshold.
Ref: South African AIP (ENR 1.8.1.2.18)
25.GIVE THE VISUAL REQUIREMENTS TO LAND OFF A
NON-PRECISION APPROACH.
The visual
requirements to land off a non-precision approach are:
i.
Elements of the approach lighting systems
ii.
The threshold
iii.
The threshold markings
iv.
The threshold lights
v.
The threshold identification lighting
vi.
The visual glide slope indicator
vii.
The touchdown zone or touchdown zone
markings
viii.
The touchdown zone lights
ix.
Runway edge lights
x.
Other visual references accepted by the
commissioner.
Ref: South African CATS (91.07.5)
26.GIVE VISUAL REQUIREMENTS TO LAND OFF A CAT
I ILS
The
visual requirements for an aircraft to land off a Cat I ILS are:
i.
Elements of the approach lighting system
ii.
The threshold
iii.
The threshold markings
iv.
The threshold lights
v.
The threshold identification lights
vi.
The visual glide slope indicator
vii.
The touchdown zone or touchdown markings
viii.
the touchdown zone lightings
ix.
runway edge lights.
Ref: South African CATS (91.07.5)
27.STATE THE ICAO PROCEDURE FOR A MISSED
APPROACH DURING CIRCLING APPROACH.
·
If visual reference is lost while circling to land from an
instrument approach, the missed approach specified for that particular
procedure must be followed. It is expected that the pilot will make an initial
climbing turn towards the landing runway and overhead the aerodrome where the
pilot will establish the aircraft climbing on the missed approach track. In as
much as the circling manoeuvre may be accomplished in more than one direction,
different patterns will be required to establish the aircraft on the prescribed
missed approach course depending on its position at the time visual reference
is lost.
AIRCRAFT CATEGORY
|
MAX SPEED FOR VISUAL MANOEUVERING (CIRCLING) KTS
|
A
|
100
|
B
|
135
|
C
|
180
|
D
|
205
|
E
|
240
|
28.STATE THE SOUTH AFRICAN PROCEDURES FOR A
MISSED APPROACH DURING A CIRCLING APPROACH?
·
If the visual reference is lost while circling to land from an
instrument approach, the missed approach specified for that procedure must be
followed. The action is for the pilot to initiate an immediate climb towards
the initial approach Fix on which the instrument approach is based on, unless
otherwise instructed by the Air traffic control.
29.WHAT DOES THE TERM “LVP” MEAN, WHEN WILL
IT BE IN FORCE AND WHAT ARE THE LIMITATIONS?
·
LVP – Stands for “Low Visibility Procedure”.
·
They are established
when the RVR less than 600m and the ceiling is less than 200 ft.
·
In South Africa LVP are
only established at Johannesburg international and Cape Town
international.
·
Pilots can expect ILS localizer and glide path signals to be
fully protected from interference during the final approach, vehicle traffic is
reduced, perimeter gates are closed, all required lighting facilities are
verified serviceable and localizer sensitive area (LSA) is protected from the
time pilots are notified that LVP’s are in operation until the time that pilots
are notified that LVP’s have been cancelled.
·
ATC will inform pilots when LVP’s is in force. This may be
obtained via the ATIS.
Ref: South African AIP (ENR
1.8.4)
30.WHAT ARE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A VISUAL
APPROACH
·
The
flight shall not be cleared to descend below the initial approach altitude as
specified for a specific approach unless:
o
The pilot has reported passing an appropriate point defined by
a radio aid and;
o
The pilot reports that the aerodrome is visual and can be
maintained in visual contact, or
o
Within 25nm of the destination aerodrome
o
The pilot is conducting an approach under radar control
·
Visual reference to terrain must be possible through-out and;
·
The cloud ceiling is at or above the approved initial approach
level or
·
The pilot reports that at the initial approach level or at any
time during the instrument approach that the meteorological conditions are such
that with reasonable assurance a visual approach and a landing can be made
·
Separation will be provided between an aircraft cleared to
execute a visual approach and landing and other arriving and departing
aircraft.
Ref:
The Instrument Rating Manual by David J Howarth
31.WHAT ARE THE SA RULES WITH REGARDS TO THE
APPROACH BAN
·
PRECISION
APPROACH
o
An approach ban is implemented by ATC when the weather falls
below landing minima for the ILS approach
o
You may not proceed further than the Outer marker if ATC
advises of an “approach ban” and have not reached the outer marker
o
If past the outer marker and an approach ban is advised by ATC,
you may proceed to the approach DA and must initiate a Go around if you are not
visual and in a position to land.
·
NON-
PRECISION APPROACH
o
An approach ban may be instituted by the ATC
o
As with the precision approach, the pilot may continue to MDA
then the MAPt if ATC institutes an approach ban after passing the equivalent
point.
o
If however the equivalent point does exist, on a non-precision
approach, use a figure of 1000 ft above the landing threshold..therefore, above
this point if an approach ban is enforced, you must continue lower than 1000ft
above the landing threshold and must commence the missed approach.
o
If past the 1000ft point, you may continue to MDA and the MAPt,
but must commence a missed approach if you are not visual at the MAPt.
32.WHAT IS THE VDP AND HOW CAN YOU DETERMINE
ITS POSITION (TIME AND DISTANCE)
·
VDP
– VISUAL DESCENT POINT – is a defined point on the final approach
track of a non-precision straight-in
approach procedure from which a normal descent from MDA to the runway touchdown
zone may be commenced, provided the approach threshold of that runway or
approach lights or other markings are clearly visible to the pilot.
·
If the VDP distance is not on the approach plate it can be
calculated by height/ distance; 300 ft per nm is the rule of thumb.
Ref:
South African AIP (ENR 1.8.1.2.31)
33.EXPLAIN THE TERM “VMC APPROACH” AND “VISUAL
APPROACH”
·
VMC
APPROACH
·
Requested by the pilot; and
·
If so prescribed by the ATSU
·
An arriving aircraft may be cleared to descend below the
initial approach altitude subject to maintain by day
§
Own separation
§
VMC
§
Visual contact with the aerodrome; and
§
By night – provided that there is no reduction of standard
separation involved.
VISUAL APPROACH
§ Means
an approach by an IFR flight when either part or all of an instrument approach
is no completed and the approach is executed with visual reference to the
terrain
Ref:
S.A.C.A.A AIP ENR 1.8
34.EXPLAIN
THE FUEL PLANNING REQUIREMENT FOR A FLIGHT CONDUCTED ON AN IF FLIGHT PLAN.
ITEM
|
FUEL
REQUIRED
|
REMARK
|
1. TAXI AND TAKE OFF
|
SUFFICIENT
|
|
2. CLIMB
|
SUFFICIENT
|
|
3. CRUISE TO TOD
|
SUFFICIENT
|
|
4. DESCENT, APPROACH AND
LANDING
|
SUFFICIENT
|
|
5. MISSED APPROACH, CLIMB
TO CRUISING LEVEL; CRUISE
TO TOD, APPROACH AND
LANDING
|
SUFFICIENT
|
|
6. CONTIGENCY
|
THE
HIGHER OF;
5%
of planned trip fuel
Or
5 minutes at holding speed at 1500ft above destination
alternate aerodrome in standard conditions
|
There are other options for this, but these require fuel
monitoring program
|
7. FINAL RESERVE
|
Reciprocating
Engines;
Fuel to fly for 45 minutes
Turbine
power Engines;
30 mins at holding speed
At 1500ft above destination alternate in standard conditions
|
Alternate need only be selected if weather forecast is not
VMC at destination
|
8. ADDITIONAL FUEL
|
Holding for 15 mins at destination aerodrome under IFR with NO alternate
OR
Enough for failure of critical or loss of pressurization,
hold for 15 mins and then approach and landing
|
Only required if fuel on board is not sufficient to cover
these events( e.g. required if over water or hostile country)
|
9. EXTRA FUEL
|
At
pilots discretion
|
Ref: The
Instrument Flight Manual by David J. Howarth
35.STATE
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “RADAR IDENTIFIED”, “RADAR CONTROL” AND “RADAR VECTOR”.
a.
RADAR
IDENTIFIED – Simply means that the aircraft has been positively identified
on radar. The relevant controller is merely using the system to monitor the
aircraft’s progress and at the same time apply radar separation standards. The
pilot remains responsible for maintaining terrain clearance
b.
RADAR
CONTROL – This term is used by ATC when it needs to alter the heading or
altitude/level of an aircraft operation in accordance with IFR in controlled
airspace. Reason for placing an aircraft under radar control will be made known
to the pilot for example when radar vectors onto an ILS are given. In this
case, the ATC becomes responsible for the maintenance of terrain clearance.
Radar control can only be given to an aircraft in controlled airspace and it
follows, therefore, that once the aircraft leaves controlled airspace he will
be notified by ATC that “radar service terminates”.
c.
RADAR
VECTOR – when given a radar vector, it is the controller responsible for
terrain clearance. Can also be defined as provision of navigational guidance to
aircraft in the form of specific headings based on the use of radar.
36.EXPLAIN
THE RECENCY CONCERNING A PILOT-IN-COMMAND OF AN AIRCRAFT ON AN INSTRUMENT
APPROACH TO AN AERODROME IN IMC.
·
A pilot shall not act as pilot-in-command of an aircraft on an instrument
approach to an aerodrome in IMC unless the pilot has, within the 90 days
immediately preceding such approach, by means of an instrument approach
procedure or procedures established by the commissioner or an appropriate
authority –
·
Executed at least two approaches in an aircraft either under
actual or simulated conditions with reference to flight instrument only; or
·
Executed at least one approach in an aircraft under actual or
simulated conditions with reference to flight instruments only and one approach
in an approved simulator; or undergone the appropriate skill test as prescribed
in CAR part 61.
Ref: South African CAR
(91.02.4)
37. WHAT IS AN EAT?
·
EAT Stands for Expected
approach time and it is the time at which ATC expects that an arriving
aircraft, following a delay will leave the holding pattern to complete its
approach for landing
NOTE:
The actual time of leaving the
holding pattern will depend upon the approach clearance.
Ref:
S.A.C.A.A AIP ENR 1.8.1.2.11(a)
38.WHAT
IS OCT?
·
OCT stands for Onward
clearance time and it is the
time given by ATC that requires an aircraft to leave the hold over an en-route
holding fix and continue en-route. OCT is generally given when the holding
period is expected to be greater than 10
minutes.
Ref: S.A.C.A.A AIP ENR 1.8.1.2.11(b)
39.MAY
A RADIO ALTIMETER BE USED TO DETERMINE THE DA FOR A CAT I ILS?
Yes, a decision height knob
positions the DH bug for use during an ILS approach. And since it is a
precision approach the radio altimeter will help in flying the approach as
precise as possible
40.MAY
A RADIO ALTIMETER BE USED TO DETERMINE THE MDA FOR A NON-PRECISION APPROACH?
No because a radio altimeter
reads altitude with reference to the ground only and to get MDA a pilot has to
add the Obstacle Clearance Height to the elevation above mean sea level.
41.WHAT
IS AN ETOPS AND HOW IS IT APPLIED TO A PERFORMANCE CLASS B AIRCRAFT?
·
ETOPS
– Stands for Extended
Twin-Engine Operations. The designation given to over- ocean flights far
from possible emergency landing strips, which represents heightened risk in a
twin engine aircraft. Before certification, engines have to demonstrate a very
high mean time between failures. An aircraft or engine type is not normally
ETOPS certified until it has been proven in normal service for at least one year.
42.EXPLAIN
THE DIFFERENT MISSED-APPROACH SEGMENTS FOR A PERFORMANCE CLASS B AIRCRAFT.
·
The missed-approach segment consists of 3 segments:
·
The
initial stage: It is the phase of the missed approach that begins at the MAPt and
ends at the point where the climb is established. Due to high workload on the
pilot there are generally no turns specified in this phase
·
The
intermediate stage: It is the phase in which the climb is continued, normally
straight ahead. It extends to the first point where 164ft obstacle clearance is
obtained and can be maintained. The intermediate missed approach track may be
changed by maximum of 15 degrees from that of the initial missed approach
phase. During this phase, it is assumed that the aircraft will begin track
corrections.
·
The
final phase: begins at the point where 164ft obstacle clearance is first
obtained and can be maintained. It extends to the point where a new approach,
holding or return to en-route flight is initiated. In order to maintain the
aircrafts position within the protected area, there are specific maximum speeds
that are permitted during the missed approach procedure
CATEGORY
|
MAX SPEEDS FOR MISSED APPROACH
|
|
INTERMEDIATE
|
FINAL
|
|
B
|
130
|
150
|
43.EXPLAIN
THE 5 APPROACH SEGMENTS.
a.
ARRIVAL
SEGEMENT – This could take the form of a STAR or be provided by radar
vectors in Terminal areas. The arrival route terminates at the initial approach
fix, except that in the case of some radar vectors an aeroplane could be
vectored to either the intermediate or final approach tracks.
b.
INITIAL
APPROACH SEGMENT – It may take the form of a racetrack procedure. It commences at
the initial approach fix and ends at the intermediate fix. A minimum altitude
called the initial approach altitude, is always specified and is defined as
“the lowest altitude in the holding pattern or on an arrival route of an
instrument approach procedure, providing the required protection against
obstacles. This altitude may be below
Minimum Sector Altitude (MSA) and accepted by the pilot, when being vectored
under radar control. Where a racetrack procedure is used, a fixed outbound leg
distance is normally specified to keep the aircraft within an area where
obstacle clearance is provided. Minimum obstacle clearance of 1000ft is provided
in the primary area.
i.
Reversal
procedure: The procedure may be in the form of a procedure base turn.
Entry is restricted to a specific direction or sector entry. A particular turn
normally a base turn or procedure turn is prescribed, and to remain within the
airspace provided requires strict adherence to the directions and timing.
ii.
Procedure
turn approach: It is a reversal procedure that once completed aligns the
aircraft with the final approach path. It may be the primary method of aligning
the aircraft with the final approach path or may be used instead of a racetrack
pattern. When using a procedure turn approach the aircraft should be
approaching the IAF within 30 degrees
of the outbound heading. If a
procedure turn approach is allowed and the aircraft is within 30 degrees either
side of the outbound heading, the approach plate will stipulate that the pilot
must use the phraseology “request
procedure turn approach”.
1.
Speed restrictions may be imposed on some
reversal procedures although a maximum speed for a reversal or racetrack
procedure is provided CAT A = 110kts
IAS, CAT B = 140kts IAS.
2.
Bank angle are either rate 1 or 25 degrees
whichever is less
3.
The inbound track must be intercepted
following a parallel entry when proceeding to the final segment of the approach
4.
The aircraft shall cross the fix or
facility and fly outbound on the specified track descending as necessary to the
specified altitude
5.
If further descent is specified after the
inbound turn, this descent shall not be started until established on the
inbound track.
6.
Outbound timing for a racetrack procedure
when based on a facility starts when a beam the facility or an attaining the
outbound heading, whichever comes later
7.
When based on a fix the outbound timing
starts from attaining the outbound heading.
c.
THE INTERMEDIATE SEGMENT – This
is the segment during which the aircraft speed and configuration should be
adjusted to prepare the aircraft for final approach. The descent gradient is
kept as shallow as possible. During the intermediate approach, the obstacle
clearance requirement reduces from 984ft to 492ft in the primary area. Where a
FAF is available, the intermediate approach segment begins when the aircraft is
on the inbound track of the procedure turn, base turn or final inbound leg of
the racetrack
pattern.
N/B Where no final approach fix is
specified, the inbound track is the final approach segment.
d.
THE
FINAL APPROACH SEGMENT
i.
NON-PRECISION
WITH A FAF – This segment begins at a facility or fix, called the final
approach fix (FAF) and ends at the missed approach point (MAPt). The FAF is
sited on the final approach track at a distance that permits selection of final
approach configuration, and descent from intermediate approach altitude/height
to the MDA applicable either for a straight- in approach or a visual circling.
The optimum distance for locating the FAF relative to the threshold is 5 nm.
The maximum length should not normally be greater than 10nm. The FAF is crossed
at, or above a specified altitude/height and descent is then initiated. The
descent gradient is published, and where range information is available,
descent profile information is provided. The Maltese cross symbol is used to
identify the final approach fix on an approach chart.
ii.
NON-PRECISION
APPROACH WITH NO FAF – This is where an aerodrome procedure may
be designed where the facility is both the IAF and the MAPt. These procedures
will indicate a minimum/height for a reversal procedure or racetrack, and an
OCH/H for final approach. In the absence of a FAF, descent to MDA/H is made
once the aircraft is established inbound on the final approach track. Normally
the final approach track cannot normally be aligned on the runway centerline as
the facility is situated on or near the aerodrome and not on the runway centre
line.
iii.
PRECISION
APPROACH- Begins at the final approach point (FAP). This is a point in
space on the centerline of the localizer azimuth specified for the final
approach track where the intermediate approach altitude/height intersects the
nominal glide path elevation angle. Generally glide path elevation angle
interception occurs at heights from 984ft to 2955ft above the runway elevation.
In that case 3 degrees glide path elevation angle interception occurs between 3
nm and 10nm from the threshold. The intermediate approach track is designed to
place the aircraft on the localizer azimuth specified for the final approach
track at an altitude/height that is below the nominal glide path elevation
angle as to ensure interception of the correct glide slope. The final approach
area contains a fix or facility that permits verification of the glide path
elevation angle/altimeter relationship. The outer marker or DME fix is normally
used for this purpose. The final approach point for a precision approach is depicted
by the glide slope/path intercept point.
e.
THE
MISSED APPROACH SEGMENT – This phase of the instrument approach
procedure has been kept as simple as possible as the pilot is faced with the
demanding task of changing the aircraft configuration, altitude and attitude. A
missed approach procedure is designed to provide protection from obstacles
throughout the missed approach manoeuvre. Specifies a point at which the missed
approach begins (The missed approach point- MAPt) and a point or
altitude/height where it ends. The missed approach is assumed to be initiated
not lower than the DA/H in precision approach procedures, or at a specified
point in non-precision approach procedures not lower than the MDA/H. The MAPt
is a procedure may be
i.
The point of intersection of an electronic glide path with the
applicable DA/H
ii.
A navigational facility; or
iii.
A fix; or
iv.
A specified distance from the FAF.
Ref: The Instrument Rating
Manual by David J Howarth
44.WHAT
ARE THE MISSED APPROACH PROCEDURES, LIMITATIONS AND PROTECTION?
a.
THE
INITIAL STAGE: Of the missed approach begins at the MAPt and ends at the point
where the climb is established. Due to high workload on the pilot there are
generally no turns specified in this phase.
b.
THE
INTERMEDIATE STAGE: it is the phase in which the climb is continued, normally
straight ahead. It extends to the first point where 164ft obstacle clearance is
obtained and can be maintained. It may be changed by a maximum of 15 degrees
from that of the initial missed approach phase. During this phase, it is
assumed that the aircraft will begin track corrections.
c.
THE
FINAL PHASE: Begins at the point where 164ft obstacle clearance is first
obtained and can be maintained. It extends to the point where a new approach,
holding or return to en-route flight is initiated. Turns maybe prescribed in
this phase.
CATEGORY
|
MAX
SPEEDS FOR MISSED APPROACH
|
|
INTERMEDIATE
|
FINAL
|
|
A
|
100
|
110
|
B
|
130
|
150
|
C
|
160
|
240
|
D
|
185
|
265
|
E
|
230
|
275
|
Ref: The Instrument Rating Manual by David
J Howarth
45.HOW
SHOULD DEVIATIONS FROM A FLIGHT PLAN BE DEALT WITH (IN FLIGHT)?
·
In the event that a controlled flight inadvertently deviates
from its current flight plan, the following action shall be taken
o
Deviation
from track: If the aircraft is off track, action shall be taken forthwith
to adjust the heading of the aircraft to regain track as soon as practicable
o
Variation
in True Airspeed: If
the average true airspeed at cruising level between reporting points varies or
is expected to vary by plus or minus 5 percent of the true airspeed, from that
given in the flight plan, the appropriate air traffic services unit shall so be
informed
o
Changes
in Time estimate: If
the time estimate for the next applicable reporting point, flight information
region boundary or destination aerodrome, whichever comes first, is found to be
in error in excess of 3 minutes from that notified to air traffic services, or
such other period of time as is prescribed by the appropriate ATS authority or
on the basis of air navigation regional agreements, a revised estimated time
shall be notified as soon as possible to the appropriate air traffic services
unit.
·
Subject to the provisions of CAR 91.3.6.2.2 all changes to a
flight plan submitted for an IFR flight, or a VFR flight operated as a
controlled flight, shall be reported as soon as practicable to the appropriate
air traffic service unit. For other VFR flights, significant changes to a
flight plan shall be reported as soon as practicable to the appropriate air
traffic unit.
·
Information submitted prior to departure regarding fuel
endurance or total number of persons carried on board, if incorrect at time of
departure, constitutes a significant change to the flight plan and as such must
be reported.
Ref:
South African CAR (91.03.4)
46.WHAT
ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A “CLOUD BREAK” AND NDB APPROACH?
a.
CLOUD
BREAK – A cloud break procedure is one at which when one or more of the
following conditions apply:
i.
Such procedure is conducted outside
controlled airspace
ii.
Such procedure is conducted inside
controlled airspace
iii.
The runway and/or equipment does not
comply with ICAO requirements for instrument approach procedures
iv.
The runway is not aligned with the final
approach track
v.
Local QNH may not be available
vi.
Any Cloud break procedure conducted
outside Controlled Airspace is conducted at the discretion of the
Pilot-in-command.
Ø In
the event for such runway and /or equipment does not comply with ICAO
requirements, the OCH/H will not be lower than that specified for circling
minima as applicable to aircraft category as follows
·
Category A – Minimum obstacle clearance
·
Category B – above any obstacle in the visual manoeuvring area
= 295ft
·
Category C – minimum obstacle clearance
·
Category D – above any obstacle in the visual manoeuvring area
= 394ft
Ø Provided
that the minimum obstacle clearance height (OCH) is not less than
o
CAT A – 400ft
o
CAT B – 500ft
o
CAT C – 600ft
o
CAT D – 700ft; WHILE
b.
NDB
APPROACH
i.
The lowest MDH that can be used is 300ft
ii.
A descent to MDA may be authorized on a time basis if when
conducting an NDB approach that utilizes a secondary facility if the secondary
NDB is unserviceable (unless another MDA is specified for this circumstances –
Note if a 2 NDB approach is flown both must be serviceable in order to fly to
the lower MDA).
iii.
The aircraft must have a serviceable ADF in order to fly the
approach
iv.
By Intercepting specific bearings to and from the NDB using the
ADF the pilot aligns the aircraft on the final approach course
Ref: S.A.CA.A. AIP ENR 1.8
47.WHAT
ARE THE LIMITATIONS FOR SINGLE PILOT IF AND NIGHT OPERATIONS UNDER PART 135?
1.
The
operator of a small commercial air transport aeroplane shall ensure:
o
A holder of a commercial pilot license does not operate as a
pilot-in-command of an aeroplane certified in the aeroplane flight manual
referred to in regulation 135.04.4 for single-pilot operations unless
§ For
operations under IFR or by night in a small commercial air transport
turbo-propeller or turbojet aeroplane, an operator shall ensure that the
minimum flight crew is two pilots: provided that in the case of a turbojet
aeroplane, a single-pilot operation is allowed if
·
The aeroplane has been certified for single-pilot IFR
operations; and
·
The operator has included in the operations manual, referred to
in sub regulation 135.04.2, a conversion and recurrent training program for
pilots which include the additional requirements for a single-pilot operation.
·
When conducting passenger carrying operations under VFR outside
a radius of 50 nautical miles from an aerodrome of departure the pilot has a
minimum of 300 hours total flight time on aeroplanes or holds a valid
instrument rating; or
·
When operating on a multi-engine type under IFR, the pilot has
a minimum or 400 hours total flight time on aeroplanes which includes 200 hours
as pilot-in-command of which 100 hours have been under IFR including 40 hours
multi-engine operation: provided that the 200 hours pilot-in-command may be
substituted by hours operating as co-pilot on the basis of 2 hours co-pilot is
equivalent to one hour as pilot-in-command: provided further that these hours
are gained within an established multi-pilot flight crew system prescribed in
the operations manual to in regulation CAR 135.04.2.
Ref:
South African CAR (135.03.6)
48.WHAT
ARE THE LIMITATIONS FOR A SINGLE ENGINE AIRCRAFT IF AND NIGHT OPS UNDER PART
135?
·
The operator of a small commercial air transport aeroplane
shall not operate the aeroplane in accordance with IFR, unless such aeroplane
is equipped with:
(a) A magnetic compass;
(b) An accurate time-piece
showing the time in hours, minutes and seconds;
(c) To sensitive pressure altimeters with subscale settings,
calibrated in hectopascal, adjustable for any barometric pressure setting
likely to be encountered during flight;
(d)
An airspeed indicator system with heated pitot tube or equivalent means for
preventing malfunctioning due to either condensation or icing, including a
warning indicator of pitot heater failure;
(e)
A vertical-speed indicator;
(f)
A turn-and-slip indicator, or a turn co-coordinator, incorporating a slip indicator;
(g)
An attitude indicator;
(h)
A stabilized direction indicator;
(i)
A means of indicating on the flight deck the outside air temperature in degrees
Celsius;
(j)
An alternate source of static pressure for the altimeter and the airspeed and
vertical-speed indicators a
(k) A chart holder in an easily readable
position which can be illuminated,
if to be operated by night.
Ref: Aviation Legislation in South Africa 135.05.3
49.WHAT
ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A PILOT TO OPERATE UNDER PART 135 (SINGLE AND
MULTI ENGINE AIRCRAFT)
The operator of a small commercial
air transport aeroplane shall ensure that the holder of a commercial pilot
licence does not operate
·
When conducting passenger carrying operations under VFR outside
a radius of 50 nautical miles from an aerodrome of departure the pilot has a
minimum of 300 hours total flight time on aeroplanes or holds a valid
instrument rating; or
·
When operating on a multi-engine type under IFR, the pilot has
a minimum or 400 hours total flight time on aeroplanes which includes 200 hours
as pilot-in-command of which 100 hours have been under IFR including 40 hours
multi-engine operation: provided that the 200 hours pilot-in-command may be
substituted by hours operating as co-pilot on the basis of 2 hours co-pilot is
equivalent to one hour as pilot-in-command: provided further that these hours
are gained within an established multi-pilot flight crew system prescribed in
the operations manual to in regulation CAR 135.04.2.
Ref:
South African CAR (135.04)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.